Lone Worker Safety Centre

Monitoring and escalation guide

The monitoring model determines who acts first when a worker raises an alert. This guide separates fully managed external response, internal organisational response and hybrid arrangements.

Response models

Compare responsibility before comparing features

Two systems can both use an app or device but place very different responsibilities on the employer after activation.

Model A

Fully managed external response

The supplier or an external Alarm Receiving Centre receives the alert, assesses the incident, follows agreed instructions, contacts nominated responders and may contact emergency services where appropriate.

Employer verification point: The employer must still configure accurate user details, escalation contacts, response instructions and review arrangements.

Model B

Internal organisational response

Alerts go to a manager, colleague, internal control room or nominated response team. The organisation assesses the incident, contacts the worker, escalates and records the event.

Employer verification point: This model depends on responder availability, competence, supervision, out-of-hours cover and clear documentation.

Model C

Hybrid response

The supplier and employer share responsibility. Examples include ARC response out of hours, internal response during office hours, or ARC assessment followed by manager escalation.

Employer verification point: Hybrid models need written boundaries so staff and managers know who acts first in each scenario.

Implementation risk

Staff need to know who is listening and who is acting

During training, staff often know how to press an alarm but do not know whether the alert goes to an ARC, a manager, a colleague or an internal control room. That uncertainty weakens confidence and delays early use.

Confirm the first receiver of every alert type.
Document office-hours and out-of-hours variations.
Train nominated responders, not only device users.
Review missed contacts and escalation failures after tests.

Contract checks

Questions to ask before signing

Verification point: Who receives the alert first?
Verification point: Is the service monitored externally or internally?
Verification point: Can we choose a hybrid model?
Verification point: Can different teams have different escalation routes?
Verification point: Can office-hours and out-of-hours arrangements differ?
Verification point: What happens if the first manager does not answer?
Verification point: What information does the responder receive?
Verification point: Is live audio available?
Verification point: Is audio recorded?
Verification point: Can we obtain the audio?
Verification point: Is a transcript available?
Verification point: How long are records retained?

Alarm lifecycle

Define every decision from activation to closure

The written pathway should cover silent and spoken alarms, failed contact, uncertain location, medical concern, credible violence, false activation and cancelled tests. It should identify who owns each decision and the information available at that point.

1. Receive

Confirm the alert type and available context

The responder should receive an accurate user profile, current task or session, location information, contact route and role-specific instructions. A silent alarm or inability to speak must not be treated as a failed call.

2. Assess

Use agreed questions and thresholds

Where communication is safe, establish immediate danger, injury, location and support required. Where communication fails, follow the pre-agreed escalation rather than repeatedly calling in a way that could increase danger.

3. Escalate

Move to the next available response without avoidable delay

Define internal contacts, external monitoring actions and emergency-service routes. Include what happens when the first contact is unavailable and how office-hours and out-of-hours arrangements differ.

4. Close

Confirm safety, preserve records and create follow-up

An alert should not be closed only because contact was restored. Record the outcome, continuing risk, worker support, faults, evidence access and the owner of any incident or system review.

Assurance and limitations

Test both the worker and responder sides

Run scheduled exercises for emergency activation, concern-stage support, missed check-in, inability to speak, uncertain location and unavailable contacts. Record receipt, decisions, timings, failures and corrective actions. Accreditation or an Alarm Receiving Centre arrangement does not by itself guarantee a particular police or emergency-service response.

Back to the Lone Worker Safety Centre Incident evidence and reporting guide Alarm Receiving Centre glossary entry